patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Reporter's Notebook: Aug. 2 Selectmen's Meeting

A roundup of some items Lexington's Board of Selectmen took up during Monday's extra-long meeting, including a transportation program extension, a Keno license rejection and Battle Green regulations.

 

Lexpress Point-to-Point Program Extended

The Board of Selectmen Monday voted to extend a Lexpress pilot program that provides point-to-point transportation between Lexington’s senior housing villages and the Senior Center.

The program was introduced this spring as a way to encourage seniors living at Countryside, Greeley or Vynebrook villages to use public transportation and participate in Senior Center programming.

The selectmen agreed to extend the program through the end of the fiscal year at the request of Bill Levison, chairman of the Transportation Advisory Committee, who said it has minimal impact on Lexpress’ standard service.

According to the initial schedule, the point-to-point transportation program picks up seniors from the Housing Authority villages between 9:25 and 9:55 a.m., to get them to the Center for 10 a.m., and then bring them home after lunch, at about 12:45 p.m. The rides cost 25 cents, which is one-third the standard Lexpress fare.

Ke-Nope

The Elks Lodge’s application for a Keno license did not win favor with the BOS, but it did earn a strong response from Selectman Peter Kelley. 

As the selectmen decided to maintain the board’s historical stance of declining to permit Keno monitors in any facility in town — even limited-access institutions like the Elks — Kelley explained that he would never change his mind.

“I’m against gambling in any form, and I would never vote for this,” he said. “Nothing against the Elks, but making money off the backs of losers is not something I would ever support.”

Although the application before the selectmen referred only to Keno, Selectman Norm Cohen noted that the Elks might have better luck with KENO-To-Go, which he described as “quiet different” from regular Keno.

Battle Green Regs Approved

Parachuting onto the Battle Green is still prohibited after the selectmen approved the use of revised regulations for the historic Lexington Center site.

The approval came despite a plea from Tourism Committee Chairwoman Dawn McKenna to table the vote until her working group could review and comment on the regulations it spent two years developing.

McKenna noted the omission of a few items the working group had suggested, such as addressing ceremonial firearms, and requested that the selectmen allow her committee to comment and “explain the thinking behind some of the things that didn’t find their way in here.

“I’d hate to see us miss out on a couple of the important things, but most especially because this is limited to the Battle Green, and we spent time talking about the Battle Green area and treating it as one,” she said.

But the selectmen pushed forward with the vote, saying they are only allowed to be responsible for the Battle Green and that delaying approval would mean missing a deadline to get the regulations codified.

Selectman Norm Cohen said most of the regulations came from the Tourism Committee’s recommendations and he felt it would be better to adopt them now and amend later than hold up approval.

Requesting Another Continuation

Saying their no-show at a July 21 hearing on an application to demolish the Leary farmhouse was a miscommunication and not an affront to the Historical Commission, the selectmen unanimously approved Chairman Hank Manz’s plan to request that the rescheduled hearing be continued until September.

The 1840s farmhouse is located at 116 Vine St., an approximately 14-acre parcel the town purchased using Community Preservation Act funds for conservation land and affordable housing.

The selectmen designated Town Manager Carl Valente to apply for a demolition permit for the farmhouse, which is subject to the demolition delay bylaw due to its inclusion on the town’s Comprehensive Cultural Resources Survey.

Because the applicant was not at the July 21 hearing, the Historical Commission continued the application to demolish the farmhouse until it’s Aug. 18 meeting.

Unable to attend on Aug. 18, Manz said he opted to request a second continuation instead of delegating another selectman in order to show the commission he meant no disrespect.

Selectman George Burnell said he too would like to attend the hearing, as he is familiar with issues surrounding the Leary land. “You may defend our honor while I present the technical details,” Burnell said to Manz.

Related Topics: Battle Green, Leary Farmhouse, Lexpress, Tourism, Transportation, and community preservation act

Ken Karnofsky

7:10 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

I’m disappointed that this article didn’t cover the discussion of the Busa Farm property. The Board had previously stated that their next step would be to meet with the Busa Land Use Committee (BLUPC) to review and deliberate on their report.

Instead, there has been no meeting with BLUPC, but there have been private meetings with interested parties about new proposals for use of the land. Although it is disturbing that these meetings came to light only through the diligence of a concerned citizen, I’m more concerned about what they say about leadership.

BLUPC showed leadership by considering input from all sources in a fair and open process, and unanimously recommending that the primary use of the land remain farming. Many ordinary citizens have shown leadership, by standing up and explaining why a community farm is the use that would provide the greatest benefit for the most people. I ask that the Board of Selectmen also show leadership by staying true to the process they created, and immediately reviewing the work of BLUPC in a public session.

In last night’s meeting, members of the board said that they “only asked for an analysis, nor a recommendation” from BLUPC. The fact is, they got a clear and well-informed recommendation. That’s because BLUPC listened to the merits of the proposals and heard the overwhelming support of Lexington citizens for a community farm.

Reply

Meg Muckenhoupt

8:16 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Technically, the Selectmen asked the BLUPC to "evaluate" the proposals, which implies making value judgements. The full text of the BLUPC's charge is here: http://ci.lexington.ma.us/Selectmen/BLUCPCharge-Final0410.pdf

And yes, it is curious that the Selectmen received an "alternative layout" for housing on the Busa site from the Lexington Housing Partnership on April 28, months after the BLUPC had submitted its report. Why appoint a committee to evaluate proposals if you're going to accept proposals after the committee has stopped meeting?

Reply

Sandra Shaw

11:06 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

I believe that the BLUPC did the job they were asked to do: study the various Busa land use proposals, then submit their recommendations to the Selectmen. Now it is the Selectmen's responsibility to consider all of the proposals, ask questions of the proponents, and to finally make the decision as to how the Busa land should be used to best serve all of the Town's needs and priorities. The BLUPC's role has been completed.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Patrick Ball

11:27 am on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Hi Ken,
I'm sorry you were disappointed the this morning's quick roundup did not address the Busa issue. We'll have coverage from last night's meeting and this morning's posted on the site later today or tomorrow morning.

Reply

Leave a comment